
Faith. The perennial hope of that handsomest of devils, George Michael, and the refuge of the desperate and the misguided? Perhaps. It’s easy to judge people, isn’t it? Even easier to pigeonhole them for possessing something that may be either temporarily or permanently beyond our own reach.
I used to think that I had faith in people. In the human race. But as I’ve got older and not necessarily wiser, I’ve begun to doubt even that. It seems to me that humanity is consumed by its own self-importance and in danger of disappearing up its own collective arsehole. People are often motivated by their own interest, no shock or even judgement there. How often do we agree to something because we know that, even subconsciously, it will benefit us in some way further down the line. Folk are fickle though and far from reliable. It seems to me that faith should be built on certainty and unshakable optimism and I’m not sure that I possess either in bucket-loads when I think about mankind.
So, what’s the alternative? Faith in God? But which God? To my relatively simple yet overactive mind, I suspect that Gods were created by man to manipulate the masses. Perhaps God is humanity itself and we’re supposed to share one belief and common goal, but let’s face it, that’s arguably a little too close to a version of socialism for the rich and the powerful to subscribe to. Far easier to come up with an idea that in many ways is almost too good to be true but laced with just enough fear to make non-conformity what must once have been a challenging decision. Enlightenment for many was a long time coming and some never received the memo. Don’t get me wrong, I respect everybody’s right to choose their beliefs, but when people declare that religion is at the root of the world’s problems, I wonder if they pause and consider why they think that. Take Christianity as an example, which is often used to encourage intolerance or worse. A shared belief, a collective awakening could be used to make the world a better place. So why isn’t it?

Perhaps God would be better described as a feeling or emotion, eschewing the personification that perhaps makes believing a more palatable option? I’ve heard it said that God is love, so why are so many of the devout so intolerant of others? We are told that God forgives, yet in a society that is so self-righteous, forgiveness itself becomes the Holy Grail.
These were thoughts that were knocking at my head as I struggled to make progress on my third book in the Ivyford Chronicles series and I then began to look at Gods and their place in both history and modern day society. And then I wondered, after reading Jung’s thoughts on the collective unconscious, what would happen if the gods that mankind created were willed into existence within that spiritual plane. Would they be happy to exist among the dreams of their creators, to be worshipped until such a time when man rose above such a simple existence and began to question his own place in the Universe. As religion became superseded by science for some, was there a tipping point reached where there weren’t enough believers left to sate the appetite of the Gods? And if so, what would the Gods do then? It’s a work in progress…
That’s when I looked at the shattering of the collective unconscious and the effect that it would have on mankind, the destruction or damaging of that most basic need or desire to herd together with like-minded souls, to share experiences. Is religion a vehicle to support that subconscious desire to gather and share and the gods therefore creations born out of that collective experience that are essential in propagating the herd mindset?
My own experiences with religion are few and far between. I have a vague recollection of mother being a member of a church in Horsham after she left my father and even more elusive memories of that ‘church’ being very proscriptive in terms of what the congregation were and weren’t allowed to do – which brings me back to that earlier thought process of religion being used to control the masses. So many debates around religion are fuelled by what we shouldn’t be doing, but if a species is hard-wired into sharing experiences either through conscious thought or a collective unconscious, then surely their raison d’être becomes about the process of having those experiences and not being limited by constraints placed upon them. Would we discover more about ourselves by making mistakes in friendships and relationships without the need to be kept in place – discounting those ‘rules’ that prevent us from doing harm to each other as living beings of course.
If we’re exploring the meaning behind the collective unconscious then that should be fundamental to the herd experience. The flip side, of course, is considering whether or not we are collectively ‘better off’ with guidance and restrictions in place, but who should have the authority to outline those ‘rules’. Many will be governed by an innate sense of what is right and wrong and the majority of us have always had a firm understanding of the difference between good and bad.
It could be argued that developments over the last twenty years or so are attempts to undermine that very foundation of human life. The rich and powerful are more aware of the threat of a united society and have diverted their efforts into fragmenting that unity and driving that feeling of superiority that they enjoy over the billions of human beings who neither seek nor desire their assumed, self-created hierarchical existence.
I remember seeing Suzy Eddie Izzard (formerly Eddie Izzard) perform and discuss her experiences of coming out as transgender. While I don’t recall the percentages, she suggested that maybe 80 percent of people don’t give a shit and I think the same could be said about most issues across the globe. Most people, as Eddie suggested, are:
‘What? You’re trans? Ok. Whatever. I’m cooking eggs, ok?’

The other twenty percent are divided into two camps. Ten percent are relaxed and groovy about it and the other ten percent are furious. Unfortunately, that ten percent are the loudest and worryingly nowadays are those given the widest platforms with two explicit aims. To keep the ten percent angry and to keep the 80 percent indifferent. It’s not the groovy ten percent that is a threat to the current climate, it’s those who see their priority as cooking eggs, maintaining the status quo as long as it doesn’t affect their own tiny portion of the world.
Could this be a negative by product of the collective unconscious? Are we subconsciously pre-programmed to accept a herd mentality, to desire it even and accept oppression and coercion from the negative ten percent? Is the desire to share an experience with 80 percent of the population stronger than the ability to question and challenge a distasteful narrative? Why is it that a huge percentage of the world’s population only react to problems when they land on their own doorsteps?
I’ve tried believing in a God and it was when I was at my lowest, my most desperate. When I wanted… no, needed something to believe in. None of which is likely to endear me to the most devout of believers but equally, I’m pretty certain that’s when those on the other side of the argument have wanted to believe. For me, it was when my sister, Carole, was lying unresponsive in a hospital bed and my family decided that that was the perfect time to try and make sense of the tumultuous circumstances that had led us to that moment. I wanted Carole to survive, to get better. I wanted a miracle, because I’d already worked out what was happening and I didn’t want to believe it.
Similarly, after she died I wanted to believe that she had gone to ‘a better place’ because it made the unpalatable bearable, it made the brutality and finality of death easier to accept. Despite wanting to believe, despite ‘opening my heart to the possibility of a God’ at no point did I ‘feel’ anything and let’s be honest, I’m all about the feeling. Of course, it’s entirely possible that I was looking for the wrong thing, that because of my thought processes and experiences that I completely missed a ‘sign’ but realistically, I don’t think that I was ever cut out for believing in a higher power. I’d rather believe in the tangible, the absolute, something that I can see and feel. Again, that’s not intended as a criticism of anyone who believes in a God or indeed those who would argue that they ‘feel’ their version of a God. I’m not here to judge anyone, we should be free to believe what we choose.
Plenty of questions and not many answers, perhaps because the ‘solutions’ would reveal something about ourselves that we would rather not know. But these are the thoughts that keep me awake at night and the questions that undermine my attempts to fit into a world where I don’t always feel that I belong. And if there was a God (and perhaps you’ll need to forgive me for personification here), I don’t think they would be how the angry ten percent would want them to be. It seems to me that they want a vengeful God, a judgemental higher power whose name would allow them absolution from their dark deeds.
That’s not the God I’d like. Ideally, they would be more like the groovy ten percent. Chilled, with an ‘each to their own’ mentality, encouraging free thought and love and kindness, which sounds like I’m describing a particularly appealing wine. Let my cup runneth over with that, thank you very much.
But where I am right now, I think they’d be far more likely to be like the eighty percent. Cooking eggs and letting the world turn around them. Ignoring problems that aren’t of their making and maybe more than a little disappointed with humanity but unwilling or unable to say so.
And I suppose I’m okay with that.
Copyright Alec Hepburn, 2026.





















